Changes between Version 7 and Version 8 of NetCDF_ProjectionTestingStatus


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 18, 2011, 7:48:19 AM (13 years ago)
Author:
etourigny
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • NetCDF_ProjectionTestingStatus

    v7 v8  
    3232'''Issues with CF-1 implementation of specific projections''':
    3333
    34  * AEA : The OGC WKT version has 2 Std parallels - whereas the CF-1.5 version says it can have either 1 or 2 std parallels. How would the 2SP version be converted to a CF 1SP version, and vice-versa?
     34 * AEA : The OGC WKT version has 2 Std parallels - whereas the CF-1.5 version says it can have either 1 or 2 std parallels. How should the CF 1SP version be converted to OGC WKT, and vice-versa? Currently the driver imports an AEA with 2 identical std_parallels.
    3535 * LCC : The OGC WKT 'Lambert_Conformal_Conic_2SP' maps clearly to LC in CF-1 with 2 std parallels. The CF-1 spec claims that a 1SP version can be used, but it doesn't include a 'scale_factor' as does the OGC WKT 'Lambert_Conformal_Conic_1SP'. Is there a way to do this conversion?
    3636 * CEA : The CF-1 conventions claim this can be encoded with a 'scale_factor_at_projection_origin' alternative to standard parallel - how would this conversion be done back from OGC WKT?
    3737 * PS : This projection's parameters in CF-1 are quite unusual, and significantly different from http://www.remotesensing.org/geotiff/proj_list/polar_stereographic.html. In particular finding a CF-1 equivalent for 'latitude of natural origin' is proving difficult.
    38  * Rot pole : Not able yet to test: as seems GDAL needs support of advanced proj4 strings that can handle rotated coord systems.
     38 * Rot pole : Not able yet to test: as seems GDAL needs support of advanced proj4 strings that can handle rotated coord systems (see bug #4285).