Changes between Initial Version and Version 5 of Ticket #885


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 15, 2008, 3:55:53 AM (16 years ago)
Author:
Mateusz Łoskot
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #885

    • Property Cc Mateusz Łoskot added
    • Property Keywords ecw added

  • Ticket #885 – Description

    initial v5  
    1 {{{
    2 In the current cvs version specifing a target doesn't really do anything.  I
    3 tried numbers from 0 to 100 and all seemed to default to highest quality.
     1In the current cvs version specifing a target doesn't really do anything. I tried numbers from 0 to 100 and all seemed to default to highest quality.
    42
    5 I would also suggest that TARGET be specified as a rate instead of a percentage,
    6 more consisitent with the ER Mapper ECW documentation.  when I hacked out the
    7 percentage and directly assigned to rate the compression worked ok.
     3I would also suggest that TARGET be specified as a rate instead of a percentage, more consisitent with the ER Mapper ECW documentation. When I hacked out the percentage and directly assigned to rate the compression worked ok.
    84
    9 It might be helpful to throw out some debug as to what the actual compression
    10 rate was since their compressor actually gives you back performance feedback values.
     5It might be helpful to throw out some debug as to what the actual compression rate was since their compressor actually gives you back performance feedback values.
    116
    12 ie, nCompressionRate=1 is highest quality, seen anywhere from 2:1 - 5:1
    13 nCompressionRate 15 seen anywhere from 18:1 to 25:1
    14 }}}
     7ie, nCompressionRate=1 is highest quality, seen anywhere from 2:1 - 5:1 nCompressionRate 15 seen anywhere from 18:1 to 25:1