Changes between Version 4 and Version 5 of FDORfc2


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Mar 21, 2007, 1:42:06 PM (17 years ago)
Author:
gregboone
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • FDORfc2

    v4 v5  
    147147== Unresolved ==
    148148
    149 * It is questionable whether a method that can trigger a good deal of processing work belongs in a property oriented class like FdoRasterDataModel.
     149* It is questionable whether a method that can trigger a good deal of processing work belongs in a property oriented class like !FdoRasterDataModel.
    150150
    151151* When the raster data model bitsPerPixel is changed to 8, it is unclear how the provider is expected to convert the image to this number of bits per pixel.  Should it scale using the min/max described here?  Currently the FDO provider just truncates values outside the target pixel type range (as does the underlying GDAL RasterIO() API).