Changes between Version 17 and Version 18 of FDORfc28


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Nov 5, 2008, 12:12:50 PM (16 years ago)
Author:
robertfortin
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • FDORfc28

    v17 v18  
    6060== Standard Considerations ==
    6161
    62 During the initial proposal of this RFC (which was focusing on returning the StartX/Y/Z and EndX/Y/Z of any geometry),  many altertives were considered.  The concensus was that fdo should try to use an existing standard.  The function signature adopted here are based on the OGC [http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/sfa Simple Feature Access] standard.
     62During the initial proposal of this RFC (which was focusing on returning the StartX/Y/Z and EndX/Y/Z of any geometry),  many altertives were considered.  The concensus was that FDO should try to adopt an existing standard.  The function signatures adopted here are based on the OGC [http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/sfa Simple Feature Access] standard.
    6363
    6464Other functions were considered for the initial RFC proposal but are __outside the scope__ of this RFC: