1 | | Work in Progress. |
| 1 | = FDO RFC 16 - FDO Provider for SQLite = |
| 2 | |
| 3 | This page contains a request for comments document (RFC) for the FDO Open Source project. |
| 4 | More FDO RFCs can be found on the [wiki:FDORfcs RFCs] page. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | == Status == |
| 7 | |
| 8 | ||RFC Template Version||(1.0)|| |
| 9 | ||Submission Date|||| |
| 10 | ||Last Modified||Traian Stanev 2008-03-18|| |
| 11 | ||Author||Traian Stanev|| |
| 12 | ||RFC Status||draft|| |
| 13 | ||Implementation Status||under development|| |
| 14 | ||Proposed Milestone|||| |
| 15 | ||Assigned PSC guide(s)||(when determined)|| |
| 16 | ||'''Voting History'''||(vote date)|| |
| 17 | ||+1|||| |
| 18 | ||+0|||| |
| 19 | ||-0|||| |
| 20 | ||-1|||| |
| 21 | |
| 22 | == Overview == |
| 23 | |
| 24 | This RFC proposes a new FDO provider for accessing (spatial) data stored in SQLite database files. |
| 25 | |
| 26 | == Motivation == |
| 27 | |
| 28 | SQLite is an efficient and popular way to store data. Support for accessing SQLite databases via FDO would expand the range of data sources supported by FDO. |
| 29 | |
| 30 | == Proposed Solution == |
| 31 | |
| 32 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | == Implications == |
| 35 | |
| 36 | This is a new provider, so there will be no issues with backwards compatibility. |
| 37 | |
| 38 | == Test Plan == |
| 39 | |
| 40 | How the proposed change will be tested, if applicable. New unit tests should be detailed here??? |
| 41 | |
| 42 | == Funding/Resources == |
| 43 | |