Opened 13 years ago
Last modified 10 years ago
#112 new defect
Many CRS Definitions don't have useful range specifications — at Version 2
Reported by: | Norm Olsen | Owned by: | Norm Olsen |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | 3.0 |
Component: | Dictionaries | Version: | |
Keywords: | Range | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
There are more than 4,000 CRS definitions in the coordsys.asc file which do not have a geographic useful range specified.
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 13 years ago
Summary: | Many CSR Definitions don't have useful range specifications → Many CRS Definitions don't have useful range specifications |
---|
comment:2 by , 13 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
A 'ConsoleUtility' named csAddEpsgExtents was written which will add geographic extents to the coordsys.asc file in a manner which will enable reasonable 'diff' action to see what was done.
This new utility used three sources to apply geographic extents to the definitions in the coordsys.asc file: EPSG 7.09, a coordsys.asc file maintained by the author of CS-MAP prior to Open Source submission, and a simple algorithm which applies easily to UTM zones.
In the process, definitions in the "LEGACY" group were not altered. The result of executing this process is summarized:
NOTE: that in the CS-MAP context, these extents are considered to be useful ranges, and not the designed range of useage. Thus, CS-MAP extents tend to be more liberal than EPSG extents. Thus the csAddEpsgExtents application increased the size of the EPSG extents by about 25% (12.5% in each direction). The expansion of geographic system definitions was limited to a maximum of 2 degrees.