Frequently Asked Questions about PostGIS extension.
- What EPSG code should I use for my data?
- How do I do a hard-upgrade from PostGIS 1.+ to PostGIS 2.0 on Windows?
- PostgreSQL Can't install under Windows Vista
- How to create geometry from hex-encoded Well-Known-Binary string using …
- How to write geometry Well-Known-Binary to hex-encoded string?
- When were the ST_* functions first added to match the SQL-MM-centric …
- Why don't ST_Interects and ST_Intersection return consistent results?
What EPSG code should I use for my data?
If you have a .prj file, go to http://epsg2prj.org/ and plug it into the form. If you don't have a .prj file, go to http://epsg2prj.org/ or http://spatialreference.org/ and plug the name of your region into the search form and see what options are suggested.
How do I do a hard-upgrade from PostGIS 1.+ to PostGIS 2.0 on Windows?
Refer to these instructions Upgrade to Latest version of PostGIS
PostgreSQL Can't install under Windows Vista
Refer to these instructions Issues with installing under Windows Vista
How to create geometry from hex-encoded Well-Known-Binary string using SQL?
This is two-steps operation which can be executed in single SQL statement. The steps include:
- Convert Well-Known-Binary data in hexadecimal string form to raw binary using PostgreSQL function decode.
- Construct geometry object from WKB in raw binary form.
=# SELECT ST_AsText(ST_GeomFromWKB(decode('0101000000e5d022dbf93e2e40dbf97e6abc743540', 'hex'), -1)); st_astext ---------------------- POINT(15.123 21.456)
How to write geometry Well-Known-Binary to hex-encoded string?
- selecting geometry from table:
# SELECT encode(ST_AsBinary(the_geom), 'hex'); encode -------------------------------------------- 0101000000e5d022dbf93e2e40dbf97e6abc743540
- constructing geometry in-place from given Well-Known-Text:
# SELECT encode(ST_AsBinary(ST_GeomFromText('POINT(15.123 21.456)', -1)), 'hex'); encode -------------------------------------------- 0101000000e5d022dbf93e2e40dbf97e6abc743540
When were the ST_* functions first added to match the SQL-MM-centric convention?
As of PostGIS 1.3 the renaming has been in effect, as the 1.3 tag is the first appearance of ST_ prefixed functions in source:tags/1.3.0/lwgeom/lwpostgis.sql.in
Therefore, non-prefixed functions (with ST_* equivalents) are deprecated, and since the 1.3 release may not be maintained in the same way as the official ST_* functions, so don't expect them to work the same.
For example only ST_AsBinary has been upgraded to work with the new geography type because AsBinary should not be being used anymore.
Application developers should consider upgrading their code to use ST_* functions as soon as possible, therefore requiring at least PostGIS >=1.3.
As Background: The official PostGIS documentation states that most functions have been renamed and "The non ST_ functions not listed in this documentation are deprecated and will be removed in a future release so STOP USING THEM."
Why don't ST_Interects and ST_Intersection return consistent results?
Commonly, if you intersect two lines to get a point using ST_Intersection you will find that the point does not ST_Intersect either of the originating lines. This seems very inconsistent! However, you must bear in mind that numbers in a computer are not the "real numbers" of mathematics, but double-precision numbers with 64-bit storage. So the derived point may not fall exactly on the line connecting the vertices of the original line, but slightly to one side or the other, to fix into the grid of real numbers that are representable in double precision.
Less commonly, you may find two features that return true for ST_Intersects, but return an EMPTY geometry for ST_Intersection. This is because ST_Intersects is slightly more precise than ST_Intersection, so ST_Intersects is detecting an interaction, but ST_Intersection is unable to compute the intersection point.