Ticket #384 (closed defect: fixed)
documentation and clearifying of ~= change
|Reported by:||nicklas||Owned by:||nicklas|
The change #282 in behavior of ~= operator from working as a fast variant of st_OrderingEqual to just comparing bboxes is not documentated.
This was a result from discussions in #253
I don't know those different index approaches enough to understand this.
What is now the diffeence between operator = and ~=
Why use && in ST_Equals and new ~= in ST_OrderingEquals
Maybe should have been more tickets, but I don't know what here is valid questions.