Have documentation be able to handle RETURNS TABLE

[robe]

Seems most of us are in favor of RETURNS TABLE vs. using OUT params or typed setofs. Only really stumbling block for me is our documentation currently has no way of documenting such a construct.

I suppose we could pretend it is OUT since the comments and general tests would work just fine since they are all set to ignore OUTs anyway.

Though that leaves a bad test in my mouth. I think last I tried it didn't fit in nicely in the slot for output. Will have to try again and make accommodations for it if necessary.

[robe]

Milestone renamed