Invalid WFS transaction generated

[adube]

I'm currently trying the Protocol.WFS new features and I'm a problem. I use TinyOWS 0.6.0 and OL 2.7.

I've followed the wfs-protocol-transactions example to reproduce the same kind of actions ( add-modify features ) Here's the post request that OL produces for my application :

 <wfs:Transaction xmlns:wfs="http://www.opengis.net/wfs" service="WFS" version="1.0.0" outputFormat="GML2">
  <wfs:Insert>
    <feature:bdga_route_l_arc xmlns:feature="http://127.0.0.1:9999/">
      <feature:the_geom>
        <gml:MultiLineString xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml" srsName="EPSG:32198">
          <gml:lineStringMember>
            <gml:LineString>
              <gml:coordinates decimal="." cs="," ts=" ">-389909.9750701957,184819.27638712854 -390597.89136538754,183513.99931420037</gml:coordinates>
            </gml:LineString>
          </gml:lineStringMember>
        </gml:MultiLineString>
      </feature:the_geom>
    </feature:bdga_route_l_arc>
  </wfs:Insert>
</wfs:Transaction>

This post is very similar the the post produced by the wfs-protocol-transactions example. But, the example uses Geoserver and no error occurs. Tinyows gives 2 errors :

==> element Transaction: Schemas validity error : Element '{http://www.opengis.net/wfs}Transaction', attribute 'outputFormat': The attribute 'outputFormat' is not allowed.

==> element bdga_route_l_arc: Schemas validity error : Element '{http://127.0.0.1:9999/}bdga_route_l_arc': This element is not expected. Expected is one of ( {http://www.opengis.net/gml}_Feature, {http://www.opengis.net/wfs}FeatureCollection ).

Both means that the schema WFS-transaction is not respected... I don't know why it works with GeoServer, but I think it shouldn't. Normand ( one of my co-workers ) modified TinyOWS to make it ignore schema errors, and then it works fine. But, I think that's not a good solution. The post request should respect the schema ( see attached file ).

So far, I tried GML3 and also tried to edit OL code to change this behavior, but without success.

Alexandre

[adube]

The schema of WFS-transactions

[tschaub]

The issues described above are about WFS, not GML. I'll make a comment on the WFS protocol ticket (#1648), since this is relevant to the patch there (instead of the trunk or 2.7).

[fredj]

The ticket was assigned to me, I guess this is a mistake ...

[crschmidt]

sems like this is handled as part of #1648.