Changes between Version 43 and Version 44 of MapServerOGCCITECompliance


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Aug 4, 2009, 11:43:26 AM (15 years ago)
Author:
nsavard
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • MapServerOGCCITECompliance

    v43 v44  
    1 = Status report on MapServer OGC CITE Compliance =
     1= Status report on !MapServer OGC CITE Compliance =
    22
    33== WFS 1.0.0 ==
    … …  
    1414
    1515- exemptions/allowances
    16   The OGC WFS 1.0.0 compliance tests suite uses dual namespaces in the test requests. Since MapServer does not support multiple namespaces in the same map file, the tests listed in the table below failed.  After some discussion on the CITE mailing list (http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/cite-forum/2008-January/000086.html), it comes out that if a WFS server does not support multiple namespaces, the tests suite may be run as many time as there are different namespaces.  Then the test results could be combined to satisfy the tests suite.  For that, we need to create two different tests sessions:  the first one set up with the "cdf" namespace and the second one, with the "cgf" namespace, and run them separately.
     16  The OGC WFS 1.0.0 compliance tests suite uses dual namespaces in the test requests. Since !MapServer does not support multiple namespaces in the same map file, the tests listed in the table below failed.  After some discussion on the CITE mailing list (http://lists.opengeospatial.org/pipermail/cite-forum/2008-January/000086.html), it comes out that if a WFS server does not support multiple namespaces, the tests suite may be run as many time as there are different namespaces.  Then the test results could be combined to satisfy the tests suite.  For that, we need to create two different tests sessions:  the first one set up with the "cdf" namespace and the second one, with the "cgf" namespace, and run them separately.
    1717
    1818  The discussion took place on the mailing list but the final answer was posted offline by Greg Buehler.  This is why I pasted it below.
    … …  
    5858
    5959- Results Summary
    60   !MapServer passed 34 of 132 tests.
     60  !MapServer passed 34 of 132 tests.  There are 11 of 17 bugs still opened.
     61
    6162 
    62     There are two main issues.  The first one is concerned about a GetFeature request with an invalid format.  We need to know in which format we need to send the response.  An email will be sent to the list.  Also !MapServer does not support multiple namespaces.  An email has been sent to the list.  There are 11 of 17 bugs still opened.
     63    There are three main issues that are:
     64      - Namespace needs to be strip off of a feature name when serving a WFS GetFeature request (http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2432)
     65      - Add a mechanism to support gml:_geometryProperty for a WFS 1.0.0 server (http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2445)
     66      - Add multipoint, multipolygon, multilinestring geometries support to define an area in a spatial filter, when a GetFeature request is sent to a WFS 1.0.0 server (http://trac.osgeo.org/mapserver/ticket/2606)
    6367
    6468    The following table lists the tests that failed and the related ticket number.