Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of Future/TileServiceEnhancements

Timestamp:

Jun 26, 2013, 6:19:29 AM (11 years ago)

Author:

jng

Comment:

--

Future/TileServiceEnhancements

@@ -460 +460 @@
 Only up to 1 TileSetSource can be defined for any Map Definition as having multiple TileSetSources presents complex situations like how to address disparity of scale ranges between different TileSetSources.
 
-Because TileSetDefinitions are bound to a specific coordinate system, the CoordinateSystem element of the Map Definition will no longer be the single point of truth when determining if dynamic layers in a map require re-projection. Instead if a Map Definition references a TileSetDefinition, its CoordinateSystem element takes precedence over the one defined in the Map Definition. This requirement can be relaxed/lifted if/when we support raster re-projection of existing rendered tiles (Discussion required: Is this feasible?)
+Because TileSetDefinitions are bound to a specific coordinate system, the CoordinateSystem element of the Map Definition will no longer be the single point of truth when determining if dynamic layers in a map require re-projection. Instead if a Map Definition references a TileSetDefinition, its CoordinateSystem element takes precedence over the one defined in the Map Definition. If a TileSetDefinition is referenced, all dynamic layers in the Map Definition will re-project to that Coordinate System instead of the one in the Map Definition. 
+
+This requirement can be relaxed/lifted if/when we support raster re-projection of existing rendered tiles (Discussion required: Is this feasible?)
 
 In terms of parsing into a MgMap at runtime, the TileSetSource and BaseMapDefinition are mutually exclusive. In the event that both are defined (because the XML schema allows for it), the BaseMapDefinition element "wins".