| 18 | | ** add **tile support** for better large map support (Sentinel, global data, ...), supporting massive parallel computations |
| 19 | | *** tiles could then be even stored on different nodes for speed optimization |
| 20 | | *** e.g. develop a new virtual raster mapset "VRT" (special like PERMANENT) |
| 21 | | **** reading: |
| 22 | | ***** or add tile support deeply into raster lib (Rast_get_row() |
| 23 | | ***** use name scheme? make use of segment library |
| 24 | | ***** problem: due to row compression always whole row is read even if computation region is smaller |
| 25 | | **** writing: |
| 26 | | ***** more complex |
| | 18 | * add **tile support** for better large map support (Sentinel, global data, ...), supporting massive parallel computations |
| | 19 | * tiles could then be even stored on different nodes for speed optimization |
| | 20 | * e.g. develop a new virtual raster mapset "VRT" (special like PERMANENT) |
| | 21 | * reading: |
| | 22 | * or add tile support deeply into raster lib (Rast_get_row() |
| | 23 | * use name scheme? make use of segment library |
| | 24 | * problem: due to row compression always whole row is read even if computation region is smaller |
| | 25 | * writing: |
| | 26 | * it is more complex |
| | 27 | |
