id,summary,reporter,owner,description,type,status,priority,milestone,component,version,resolution,keywords,cc,cpu,platform 3757,Python3: range vs xrange,neteler,grass-dev@…,"In r74088 xrange() was changed to range(). If that change is fine, should these other xrange() usages also be changed? {{{ ag --python "" in xrange"" doc/python/raster_example_ctypes.py 67:for row_n in xrange(rows): lib/python/temporal/abstract_space_time_dataset.py 1146: >>> for i in xrange(3): lib/python/temporal/spatio_temporal_relationships.py 423:# for i in xrange(len(maps)): 425:# for j in xrange(offset, len(maps)): lib/python/pygrass/modules/interface/module.py 64: >>> for i in xrange(5): 87: >>> for i in xrange(5): 111: >>> for i in xrange(3): lib/python/pygrass/raster/__init__.py 412: >>> for row in xrange(map_a.info.rows): 442: >>> for i in xrange(4): 479: >>> for row in xrange(map_a.info.rows): 480: ... for col in xrange(map_a.info.cols): lib/python/pygrass/vector/basic.py 384: >>> for cat in xrange(100, 110): cats.set(cat, layer=cat-50) lib/python/pygrass/vector/__init__.py 87: #return (self.read(f_id) for f_id in xrange(self.num_of_features())) }}} ",defect,closed,normal,7.8.0,Python,svn-trunk,fixed,python3,,Unspecified,Unspecified