Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#2557 closed enhancement (fixed)
a few new monochrome color tables (should they be backported) ?
| Reported by: | mlennert | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 7.0.0 |
| Component: | LibGIS | Version: | svn-releasebranch70 |
| Keywords: | colortables | Cc: | |
| CPU: | Unspecified | Platform: | Unspecified |
Description
I've just committed to trunk a few very basic monochrome color tables for general usage (blues, greens, oranges, reds). They can very easily be created manually with a two line color rules definition, and so some might argue that we should not increase the length of the list of tables, but I think it is handy (and a support to new users) to have some of such color tables in the list of predefined tables.
Any objections against backporting them to relbr7 ?
Change History (3)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 9 years ago
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
Replying to neteler:
In general fine for me since they are handy.
A curiosity: why did you choose orange and not yellow?
Because I find gradients of yellow not easy to read. Oranges are easier to read, but less harsh then reds.
Moritz
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
This is part of 7.0.0, so closing as fixed.
In general fine for me since they are handy.
A curiosity: why did you choose orange and not yellow?
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/28/RGB_illumination.jpg (it would be yellow, cyan, purple as additive mixing colors of RGB)