The following table summarizes results of running a buffer against the dataset in source:trunk/tests/xmltester/tests/safe/buffer-1.01.xml || '''dist''' || GEOS 3.3.0 + patch || GEOS (b) OLD reduc stratg || GEOS (b) NEW reduc stratg || JTS (c) || || 0.35 || Same output as 3.2.0 || ok on 1st attempt, no reduction || ok on 1st attempt, no reduction || ok on 1st attempt, no reduction || || 0.75 || Same output as 3.2.0 || ok on 1st reduction (1e10) || ok on 1st reduction (1e5) || ok on 1st reduction (1e5) || || 1.01 || Same output as 3.2.0 || ok on 2nd reduction (1e9) || fail on 5th reduction (1e1) || ok on 1st reduction (1e5) || || 1.1 (a) || Same output as 3.2.0 || ok on 2nd reduction (1e9) || ok on 1st reduction (1e5) || ok on 1st reduction (1e5) || || 1.5 || Half incorrect (i) || ok on 2nd reduction (1e9) || fail on 6th reduction (1e0) || fail on 1st reduction (1e5) || || 2 || Incorrect output(ii) || fail on 10th reduction (1e1) || fail on 6th reduction (1e0) || fail on 1st reduction (1e5) || || 5 || Incorrect output(ii) || fail on 10th reduction (1e1) || fail on 6th reduction (1e0) || fail on 1st reduction (1e5) || || 10 || Incorrect output(ii) || fail on 10th reduction (1e1) || fail on 7th reduction (1e-1) || ok on 1st reduction (1e5) || (a) aka TestBufferJagged.xml [[BR]] (b) GEOS 3.3.2SVN r3523 / 3.4.0SVN r3524 on a 64bit system [[BR]] (c) JTS rev.480 [[BR]] (i) Same as GEOS 3.2.0 in xmltester. Incorrect in GEOS 3.3.0 client -- same problem as (ii). [[BR]] (ii) Output seems to have lost way too much precision. [[BR]] = Resources = diffnoding.gz contains the offsetcurve produced by both GEOS and JTS with reduction scale 1e5 and distance 1.01 against input. [[BR]] The curve, passed to [source:trunk/src/operation/buffer/BufferBuilder.cpp#L507 BufferBuilder::computeNodedEdges], results in edges with a differently computed _depth_ between JTS and GEOS.