Changes between Version 82 and Version 83 of Bolsena2010

Timestamp:

Jun 7, 2010, 3:11:51 AM (14 years ago)

Author:

Fxp

Comment:

--

Bolsena2010

@@ -86 +86 @@
  || 55 || || Multi-editing || Attempting to introduce the ability to edit more than one document makes existing trunk interface confusing eg. editing documents in tabs both of which have login details. Things get out of sync - what to do? Maybe something like BlueNetMEST which is based on one window - the main search window (tabs for remote, advanced and mapviewer) with search results - editing/viewing by clicking on title opens editor/viewer in new window (multiediting is supported), clicking any of the menu options on main screen uses modalbox dialog and separate windows to keep search interface and results window untouched, log out/log in closes all editor/viewer windows to close, if editing in progress log out not allowed - this is not perfect but might be a way of thinking about how to introduce things like multiediting to trunk.  || heikki: 5 ||
  || 56 || ||Customization || Improve CSS management, clean CSS file and references to unused styles, replacing tables by divs, discuss on [wiki:ThemeCustomization]|| heikki: 1 | jose: critical | francois : major ||
- || 57 || ||Maven migration ||Move to Maven as described here : [wiki:Maven] ||Mathieu (major) | heikki: 1 | jose: major | francois : major ||
  || 58 || ||Settings management || While at it can we change the code so that you can save settings from the GUI even if not all expected settings are present in your database?|| heikki: 1 ||
  || 59 || || SMTP || Converge mail configuration (feedback + wmc.mailcontext use same config) || heikki: 1 ||
@@ -95 +94 @@
 === Architecture ===
  ||Id || Priority (trac #) || Topics || Comments || People interested In|| Discussion ||
- ||15|| ||Framework / Refactoring ||Whether it's going to happen soon or not, I still think it good to repeat the subject of what to choose if we ever get to a drastic make-over of current GeoNetwork code, especially in terms of (1) GUI: use [http://wicket.apache.org/ Wicket]? [http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/ GWT]? (2) MVC: use [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/ Struts]? [http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/2.0.x/reference/mvc.html Spring MVC]? (3) Persistence: use [http://www.hibernate.org/ Hibernate]? use [http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2EE/jpa/ JPA/EJB3]? (4) Web Services: use [http://ws.apache.org/axis2/ Axis2]? [http://jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=311 Jax-RS]? || heikki: 3 | jose: major || ||
+ || 57 || 1 ||Maven migration ||Move to Maven as described here : [wiki:Maven] ||Mathieu (major) | heikki: 1 | jose: major | francois : major ||  ||
+ || 15 ||  ||Framework / Refactoring ||Whether it's going to happen soon or not, I still think it good to repeat the subject of what to choose if we ever get to a drastic make-over of current GeoNetwork code, especially in terms of (1) GUI: use [http://wicket.apache.org/ Wicket]? [http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/ GWT]? (2) MVC: use [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/ Struts]? [http://static.springsource.org/spring/docs/2.0.x/reference/mvc.html Spring MVC]? (3) Persistence: use [http://www.hibernate.org/ Hibernate]? use [http://java.sun.com/developer/technicalArticles/J2EE/jpa/ JPA/EJB3]? (4) Web Services: use [http://ws.apache.org/axis2/ Axis2]? [http://jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=311 Jax-RS]? || heikki: 3 | jose: major || ||