Changes between Version 52 and Version 53 of Bolsena2010


Ignore:
Timestamp:
May 18, 2010, 2:34:45 AM (14 years ago)
Author:
mcoudert
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Bolsena2010

    v52 v53  
    2424 || 2 || ||harvesters || Let's remove the harvesters' configuration from the "settings" table to its own, first-class-citizen table. Now, if you have many harvesters, it is nigh impossible to find anything in "settings". || ||
    2525 ||3 || || harvesters  || Related to before topic: rewrite harvesters client side code to remove unrequired ajax stuff. Just make "normal" forms for harvesters maintainment avoiding using ajax, except if really required for any functionality. || ||
    26  || 4 || || ||  ||  ||
     26 || 4 || || Javadoc|| Automatically add the Javadoc pages to this wiki, updated from a Hudson build process? For all of the branches? ||  ||
     27 || 5 || || Coding rules || Some people really like working with ''patches''; other people prefer using short-lived SVN branches for a similar purpose. Can we all agree on doing it one way or the other? ||  ||
     28 || 6 || || ||  ||  ||
     29 || 7 || || ||  ||  ||
    2730
    28 
    29  * Javadoc: let's clean up the existing Javadoc and add new where it is missing. It'd be good to [http://java.sun.com/j2se/javadoc/ familiarize yourself] with how Javadoc works, before doing this; e.g. there should be no blank line between the Javadoc and the method it is about; the first sentence should end in a period; and things like that.
    30 
    31  * Let's remove the harvesters' configuration from the "settings" table to its own, first-class-citizen table. Now, if you have many harvesters, it is nigh impossible to find anything in "settings".
    32 
    33  * Related to before topic: rewrite harvesters client side code to remove unrequired ajax stuff. Just make "normal" forms for harvesters maintainment avoiding using ajax, except if really required for any functionality.
    34  
    3531 * While at it can we change the code so that you can save settings from the GUI even if not all expected settings are present in your database?
    3632
    37  * Automatically add the Javadoc pages to this wiki, updated from a Hudson build process? For all of the branches?
    38 
    39  * Some people really like working with ''patches''; other people prefer using short-lived SVN branches for a similar purpose. Can we all agree on doing it one way or the other?
    4033
    4134 * This wiki is a bit of a mess, in my opinion. I think it would be good if we could put maybe 3 people in charge to firstly, clean it up and better structure it; and secondly, to try to keep it that way.