Changes between Version 22 and Version 23 of rfc24_progressive_data_support


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Aug 27, 2008, 1:30:36 PM (16 years ago)
Author:
normanb
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • rfc24_progressive_data_support

    v22 v23  
    5151''Response'':
    5252
    53 This is the big question, since within jpip (and other streaming protocols) this is handled at the dataset level as opposed to the band level.  Within JPIP the returned bands are specified using &comps=x1,x2,x3 ... as a request to the server, it would not be desirable to make 3 separate requests to the server to make an rgb image (though you could).  As such recommend that the band level access subscribes to the parent dataset for accessing the server, and that the band data is pulled from the dataset class - this is potentially the hardest part to implement, and will be deferred until the dataset access level is complete.
     53This is the big question, since within jpip (and other streaming protocols) this is handled at the dataset level as opposed to the band level.  Within JPIP the returned bands are specified using &comps=x1,x2,x3 ... as a request to the server, it would not be desirable to make 3 separate requests to the server to make an rgb image (though you could).  As such I recommend that the band level access subscribes to the parent dataset for accessing the server, and that the band data is pulled from the dataset class - this is potentially the hardest part to implement, and will be deferred until the dataset access level is complete.
    5454
    5555''Question'':