Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of SponsorshipSurvey


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Oct 12, 2007, 10:24:53 PM (17 years ago)
Author:
warmerdam
Comment:

preliminary

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • SponsorshipSurvey

    v1 v1  
     1'''This survey is intended for GDAL/OGR Sponsors.'''
     2
     31. Which aspect of GDAL/OGR is more important to your organization?  The GDAL (raster) services, or the OGR (vector/feature) services, or are both important?
     4
     52. List existing format drivers which are particularly important to your organization.  Drivers that you would like the GDAL/OGR team to take special care to maintain, and improve.
     6
     73. List any SWIG language bindings you organization uses, or would like to see improved (ie. Java, C#, Python, Perl, Ruby)  Are there particular improvements you would like to see with the language bindings?
     8
     94. Are improvements to, and better documentation for GDAL/OGR commandline utilities (like gdal_translate, ogrinfo) important to your organization?  (not at all important, somewhat important, very important)  If so, which utilities in particular?
     10
     115. Is better developer oriented API documentation for GDAL important to your organization (not at all important, somewhat important, very important)  If so, should we focus on reference documentation for the API, or tutorials on using the API?
     12
     136. Is better user documentation for the drivers important to your organization?  (not at all important, somewhat important, very important)  If so, what particular suggestions can you make?
     14
     157. Is multi-threaded use of GDAL/OGR important to your organization?  (not at all important, somewhat important, very important)  Is the primary concern thread safety (avoiding crashes/corruption) or achieving higher performance in multi-threaded use via careful fine grained locking?
     16
     178. Is support for non-English languages within GDAL/OGR important to your organization (ie. multi-byte characters in filenames, features attributes, metadata)?  (not at all important, somewhat important, very important)  If so, what particular aspects are important?
     18
     199. How important is it to your organization for GDAL/OGR to improve it's test suites, and proactive quality testing?  (not at all important, somewhat important, very important)
     20
     2110. List the operating system platforms important to your organization.  (ie. Win32, Linux on x86, Linux on other platforms, MacOS X, Solaris, IRIX, WinCE, ...)
     22
     2311. How important is it to your organization for the GDAL/OGR project to provide pre-built binaries with releases?  If so, for what platforms?  Developer oriented or end user oriented?  Any special issues?
     24
     2512. Have you found the GDAL/OGR project to be responsive in handling bug reports or support requests from your organization since your participation in the sponsorship program?  Please note any specific issues.
     26
     2713. Do you feel that GDAL/OGR sponsorship funds are being used in a responsible fashion?  Please note any concerns.
     28
     2914. Do you have any other suggestions for the GDAL/OGR project?
     30
     3115. Do you wish your responses to list survey to be kept private (only shared by members of the GDAL/OGR Project Management Committee) or may they be made publically visible?