Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of NetCDF_ProjectionTestingStatus
- Timestamp:
- Oct 17, 2011, 10:27:19 PM (13 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
NetCDF_ProjectionTestingStatus
v1 v2 6 6 7 7 ||'''Projection'''||'''Export- CF compliance'''||'''Export - openable by NetCDF Java'''||Updated||Note|| 8 ||AEA||Yes||Yes||18/10/11||Tested 2 Std Parallels export only||8 ||AEA||Yes||Yes||18/10/11||Tested regular 2SP version - see AEA note below.|| 9 9 ||AzEq||Yes||No||18/10/11||See (1) below|| 10 10 ||LAzEqA||Yes||Yes||18/10/11|||| 11 ||LC-2SP||Yes||Yes||18/10/11||T he OGC WKT Lambert_Conformal_Conic_2SP maps clearly to LC in CF-1 with 2 std parallels. Am not sure if OGC WKT Lambert_Conformal_Conic_1SP can be converted directly to LC in CF-1 using just 1 std parallel.||12 ||LCEA||Yes||No||18/10/11|| Works for 1 std parallel version. CF-1 claims can use a scale_factor instead of std parallel, not sure WKT equiv||11 ||LC-2SP||Yes||Yes||18/10/11||Tested 2SP version - CF-1 claims to have a 1SP version, but params quite different to OGC WKT so not tested. See note below.|| 12 ||LCEA||Yes||No||18/10/11||Tested regular OGC WKT with 1 std parallel version (CF-1 has alternative, see notes below). See (1) below re NetCDF-Java loading.|| 13 13 ||M-1SP||Yes||No||18/10/11||See (1) below|| 14 ||M-2SP||Yes||Yes*||18/10/11|| Loads in NetCDF Java and IDV, but appears translated from expected position||14 ||M-2SP||Yes||Yes*||18/10/11||Parameters appear correct, loads in NetCDF Java and IDV, but appears translated from expected position|| 15 15 ||Ortho||Yes||Yes||18/10/11|||| 16 ||Polar St||Yes*||?||18/10/11||See (2)below||17 ||Rot Pole||N||N||18/10/11||See (3)below||16 ||Polar St||Yes*||?||18/10/11||See projection comments below|| 17 ||Rot Pole||N||N||18/10/11||See projection comments below|| 18 18 ||St||Yes||Yes||18/10/11|||| 19 19 ||TM||Yes||Yes||18/10/11|||| 20 20 21 General notes:21 '''General notes''': 22 22 23 23 (1) For projections that won't load correctly as referenced grids in NetCDF Java, we've contacted the developers to ask for clarification/testing support. In most cases, the CF-1 attributes seem appropriate.[[BR]] 24 (2) Polar stereographic: This projection's parameters in CF-1 are quite unusual, and significantly different from http://www.remotesensing.org/geotiff/proj_list/polar_stereographic.html. In particular finding a CF-1 equivalent for 'latitude of natural origin' is proving difficult. 25 (3) Rotated pole: Not able yet to test: as seems GDAL needs support of advanced proj4 strings that can handle rotated coord systems. 24 25 '''Issues with CF-1 implementation of specific projections''': 26 27 * AEA (Albers Equal Area): The OGC WKT version has 2 Std parallels - whereas the CF-1.5 version says it can have either 1 or 2 std parallels. How would the 2SP version be converted to a CF 1SP version, and vice-versa? 28 * LCC (Lambert Conformal Conic): The OGC WKT 'Lambert_Conformal_Conic_2SP' maps clearly to LC in CF-1 with 2 std parallels. The CF-1 spec claims that a 1SP version can be used, but it doesn't include a 'scale_factor' as does the OGC WKT 'Lambert_Conformal_Conic_1SP'. Is there a way to do this conversion? 29 * LCEA (Lambert Cylindrical Equal Area): The CF-1 conventions claim this can be encoded with a 'scale_factor_at_projection_origin' alternative to standard parallel - how would this conversion be done back from OGC WKT? 30 * Polar St (Polar Stereographic): This projection's parameters in CF-1 are quite unusual, and significantly different from http://www.remotesensing.org/geotiff/proj_list/polar_stereographic.html. In particular finding a CF-1 equivalent for 'latitude of natural origin' is proving difficult. 31 * Rot pole (Rotated Poke): Not able yet to test: as seems GDAL needs support of advanced proj4 strings that can handle rotated coord systems.