Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of Ticket #6760


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jan 2, 2017, 11:09:29 AM (7 years ago)
Author:
aleks
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #6760 – Description

    v2 v3  
    77The two test cases are of 1:10000 scale raster maps.  One is the NK data set which fine and one is the NL data set which will not be recognized as a valid file.  Both are created from using gdal_translate on a .vrt file pointing to 100 smaller tiles.  The command used to create them both is:
    88
    9 $ for i in NK.vrt NL.vrt; do gdal_translate -mo TIFFTAG_XRESOLUTION=254 -mo TIFFTAG_RESOLUTIONUNIT=2 -mo TIFFTAG_IMAGEDESCRIPTION='1:10000 TILE '${i/.vrt/} -mo TIFFTAG_YRESOLUTION=254 -a_srs EPSG:27700 -co NUM_THREADS=ALL_CPUS -co BIGTIFF=NO -co COMPRESS=DEFLATE -of GTiff $i ${i/.vrt/.TIFF}; fi; done
     9$ for i in NK.vrt NL.vrt; do gdal_translate -mo TIFFTAG_XRESOLUTION=254 -mo TIFFTAG_RESOLUTIONUNIT=2 -mo TIFFTAG_IMAGEDESCRIPTION='1:10000 TILE '${i/.vrt/} -mo TIFFTAG_YRESOLUTION=254 -a_srs EPSG:27700 -co NUM_THREADS=ALL_CPUS -co BIGTIFF=NO -co COMPRESS=DEFLATE -of GTiff $i ${i/.vrt/.TIFF}; done
    1010
    1111I am using BIGTIFFF=no as i found the system won't be able to read the files ever if i use YES, I also tried to use -co PROFILE=BASELINE to form a perhaps more compliant TIFF file but the system still claims the created file is damaged/unreadable format.