Changes between Initial Version and Version 2 of Ticket #6760
- Timestamp:
- Jan 2, 2017, 7:37:23 AM (7 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #6760 – Description
initial v2 5 5 I define "successfully" if the default system viewer on my platform is able to open/recognize the image. they are from a different 100km square region in the UK but otherwise should be identical so they should both work fine. 6 6 7 The two test cases are of 1:10000 scale raster maps. One is the NK data set which fine and one is the NL data set . Both are created from using gdal_translate on a .vrt file pointing to 100 smaller tiles. The command used to create them both is:7 The two test cases are of 1:10000 scale raster maps. One is the NK data set which fine and one is the NL data set which will not be recognized as a valid file. Both are created from using gdal_translate on a .vrt file pointing to 100 smaller tiles. The command used to create them both is: 8 8 9 9 $ for i in NK.vrt NL.vrt; do gdal_translate -mo TIFFTAG_XRESOLUTION=254 -mo TIFFTAG_RESOLUTIONUNIT=2 -mo TIFFTAG_IMAGEDESCRIPTION='1:10000 TILE '${i/.vrt/} -mo TIFFTAG_YRESOLUTION=254 -a_srs EPSG:27700 -co NUM_THREADS=ALL_CPUS -co BIGTIFF=NO -co COMPRESS=DEFLATE -of GTiff $i ${i/.vrt/.TIFF}; fi; done … … 14 14 15 15 I have uploaded both the good/bad created TIFFs, as well as the .vrt used to make them, as well as the source 200 .TIFF files the .vrt references: 16 17 https://www.dropbox.com/s/6cwahje7stunx7v/bug-report-20170102-aleks.zip?dl=0 16 18 17 19 The attached file is ~263 megs big, md5 sum is: 5475898a5e3cf625d09f8ffb1b17ebef