Opened 13 years ago
Last modified 13 years ago
#4043 closed enhancement
Improve gdalwarp -cutline documentation page — at Version 1
Reported by: | EliL | Owned by: | warmerdam |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | Docs | Version: | unspecified |
Severity: | trivial | Keywords: | gdalwarp, cutline, documentation |
Cc: | eadam@… |
Description (last modified by )
Right now that gdalwarp cutline documentation says:
-cutline datasource:
Enable use of a blend cutline from the name OGR support datasource.
Even spend some considerable effort to help me understand it (Thanks). What I failed to understand was that it was the application of a mask, not altering the original raster. I would like to suggest the documentation be changed to:
-cutline datasource:
Enable use of a blend cutline from the named OGR supported datasource. This applies a mask to the raster without altering the original raster.
Perhaps even a direct suggestion to also use -crop_to_cutline or -te if you want to actually get rid of the data that you are masking. Usually the docs are appropriately concise without excess chatter so perhaps not.
I ran across this by applying -cutline to a small portion of a 3G raster and got back a 3G raster. That was not what I expected. I did eventually figure out to use -crop_to_cutline but was then confused as to exactly what -cutline was doing (namely preserving the data).
Thinking about this more, perhaps the -crop_to_cutline docs should change too, although this seems less needed. Right now it says,
-crop_to_cutline:
(GDAL >= 1.8.0) Crop the extent of the target dataset to the extent of the cutline.
What do you think of:
-crop_to_cutline:
(GDAL >= 1.8.0) Crop the extent of the target dataset to the extent of the cutline. Not specifying this when using -cutline will keep the full extent and data of the original raster.