#3293 closed defect (fixed)
REPACK changes extension case and doesn't remove previous shapefile.
Reported by: | jef | Owned by: | Even Rouault |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
Component: | OGR_SF | Version: | unspecified |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | shapefile driver |
Cc: |
Description
shapefiles with uppercase extensions are not replaced by a REPACK. Instead the new shapefiles have lower case extensions and the old files are not deleted.
Running 2292.py:
from osgeo import ogr ds = ogr.Open("2292.SHP", 1) l = ds.GetLayerByIndex(0) l.DeleteFeature(0) ds.ExecuteSQL("REPACK 2292");
gives:
$ ls; python 2292.py; ls 2292.DBF 2292.PRJ 2292.SHP 2292.SHX 2292.py 2292.DBF 2292.PRJ 2292.SHP 2292.SHX 2292.dbf 2292.py 2292.shp 2292.shx
(as of python-gdal 1.6.3-1 in Debian unstable)
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 14 years ago
comment:2 by , 14 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
comment:3 by , 14 years ago
Keywords: | shapefile driver added |
---|---|
Milestone: | → 1.6.4 |
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | new → closed |
r18334 /trunk/gdal/ogr/ogrsf_frmts/shape/ogrshapelayer.cpp: SHAPEFILE driver : Preserve file extensions in REPACK operation (#3293)
r18335 /branches/1.6/gdal/ogr/ogrsf_frmts/shape/ogrshapelayer.cpp: SHAPEFILE driver : Preserve file extensions in REPACK operation (#3293)
r18336 /trunk/autotest/ogr/ogr_shape.py: Test that REPACK preserves file extensions (#3293)
comment:4 by , 14 years ago
The above commits also fixes memory leaks in error code paths, and a crash if a REPACK was attempted on a layer with only .shp and .shx, but no .dbf
comment:5 by , 14 years ago
I've fixed a silly bug (r18897) I introduced myself a while ago which is perhaps related. Perhaps it should also go to 1.7.2 branch, I'm not sure.
comment:6 by , 14 years ago
Mateusz,
Chaintanya will do the backport. Apparently, you missed part of the discussion on IRC. He was indeed about to fix the issue as he created ticket #3434. Well, better a bug fixed twice than ignored ;-).
comment:7 by , 14 years ago
Even,
No, I did not miss that part. If st hits a fan and I'm a troublemaker, I want to clean it myself.
See also http://trac.osgeo.org/qgis/ticket/2292 QGIS #2292