Opened 15 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#2868 closed defect (fixed)
ogr2ogr, shp > KML: 1 more schema validation error
Reported by: | peifer | Owned by: | condit |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | low | Milestone: | |
Component: | OGR_SF | Version: | 1.6.0 |
Severity: | minor | Keywords: | |
Cc: | warmerdam |
Description
Here a further minor schema vaidation error, just in case you have some time to take care...
cdr_177.kml:4: element Schema: Schemas validity error : Element '{http://www.opengis.net/kml/2.2}Schema', attribute 'id': '167_Myvatn' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:ID'. cdr_177.kml fails to validate cdr_178.kml:4: element Schema: Schemas validity error : Element '{http://www.opengis.net/kml/2.2}Schema', attribute 'id': '460_thjorsarver' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:ID'. cdr_178.kml fails to validate cdr_179.kml:4: element Schema: Schemas validity error : Element '{http://www.opengis.net/kml/2.2}Schema', attribute 'id': '854_Grunnafjordur' is not a valid value of the atomic type 'xs:ID'. cdr_179.kml fails to validate
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
comment:2 by , 15 years ago
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
Perhaps these schema errors have been corrected later, GDAL having a badge: "OGC KML 2.2.0 (Official Reference Implementation)"
http://www.opengeospatial.org/resource/products/details/?pid=1218
follow-up: 5 comment:4 by , 9 years ago
Not sure that it has fixed all issues ("Official Reference Implementation" is very different from "bug-free implementation"), and difficult to tell without input data and/or output data and/or instruction how to generate them. And I'm not sure why I see "gml" strings appear in a kml ticket.
comment:5 by , 9 years ago
Replying to rouault:
And I'm not sure why I see "gml" strings appear in a kml ticket.
I can't remember either. Thanks to jratike80 and you for looking after some of my old tickets, which have been collecting dust for quite a while. I guess the the best would be to close this ticket, rather than trying to find out what the exact issue was when I opened the ticket, 6 years ago.
comment:6 by , 9 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Thanks. Closing as, let's say, fixed.
Here just a few more schema validation errors, from my bulk testing:
a) Shape_Area has more digits than are allowed ('19')
b) leading digits in element names are not stripped
Other schema errors detected during bulk testing relate to the already reported error types: