Opened 16 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#2439 closed defect (fixed)
HFA Driver does not handle Gauss Kruger projection
Reported by: | warmerdam | Owned by: | warmerdam |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | normal | Milestone: | 1.8.1 |
Component: | GDAL_Raster | Version: | 1.5.2 |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | HFA |
Cc: | gaopeng yanchen |
Description
failed to read Gauss projection for IMAGINE (hfadataset.cpp misses the handling for EPRJ_GAUSS_KRUGER). Data cr30744_v93.img is attached. (problem7.zip)
http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/attachment/ticket/2422/problem7.zip
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
Status: | new → assigned |
---|
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
File trunk/gdal/frmts/hfa/hfadataset.cpp contains:
case EPRJ_TRANSVERSE_MERCATOR: case EPRJ_GAUSS_KRUGER:
The driver obviously does handle Gauss-Krüger projection nowadays.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Reviewing ESRI .prj files, I find examples like this:
However, traditionally I have just thought of Gauss Kruger projection method as being another name for Transverse Mercator. Is there a distinction? Do we need to keep them distinct?