Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of FDORfc6


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jul 22, 2007, 7:49:59 PM (17 years ago)
Author:
yangm
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • FDORfc6

    v5 v6  
    1111||Author||(Maggie Yang)||
    1212||RFC Status||(draft)||
    13 ||Implementation Status||(pending, under development, completed)||
    14 ||Proposed Milestone||(e.g. 1.1, 1.3)||
     13||Implementation Status||(pending)||
     14||Proposed Milestone||(TBD)||
    1515||Assigned PSC guide(s)||(when determined)||
    1616||'''Voting History'''||(vote date)||
    17 ||+1||Bob, Mateusz||
    18 ||+0||Frank||
    19 ||-0||Orest||
    20 ||-1||Greg (troublemaker)||
     17||+1|| ||
     18||+0|| ||
     19||-0|| ||
     20||-1|| ||
    2121 
    2222== Overview ==
     
    2424In the current design of the OSGeo OGC FDO WMS Provider(s), no mechanism exists to allow a client to retrieve all supported CS’s for a specific WMS layer, neither for image format and style information.
    2525In order to resolve this issue, the WMS providers should be enhanced to add 3 new commands for retrieving all supported image format, style and CS information from WMS server.
    26 
    27 == Motivation ==
    28 
    29 This is the most important part of the RFC.  It describes the problem domain in detail.  Focusing on this will allow reviewers to fully understand why the proposed change is being made, and potentially suggest different/better ways of accomplishing the desired results.  The more time we spend on understanding the problem, the better our solution will be.
    3026
    3127== Proposed Solution ==